Open Access

The proceedings is open access, meaning that all content is freely available to the user or their institution. Users are free to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this proceeding without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in line with the BOAI definition of open access. Open access has received overwhelming support from both authors, who value the increased visibility of their work, and from academic institutions and funding organizations, who value the public impact of freely available research results. Benefits
Free availability through unrestricted online access Open access publications are freely available online to anyone, which increases the visibility and thus the uptake and use of the published work.

Authors retain copyright
Using a Creative Commons license allows authors/editors to retain copyright on their works. Publications can be reused and distributed as long as the original author is properly cited.

Fast publication
The streamlined and easy-to-use online submission process allows for rapid review, approval, and publication.

No space limitations
Publishing online means unlimited space for additional materials, including figures, extensive data, and videos.

Citation tracking and inclusion in bibliographic databases Open access journals are tracked for impact factors and deposited in bibliographic databases and institutional repositories without any embargo period, just like traditional journals

Published work is subject to copyright.

© All articles are available under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

This work is subject to copyright. Permission to make digital or hard copies of portions of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee, provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that the copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To otherwise reproduce or transmit in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage retrieval system or in any other way requires written permission from the publisher.

Ethics

The editorial board of the journal accepts and adheres to the principles of publication ethics accepted by the international scientific community and reflected in the recommendations of the Publication Ethics Committee (Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Duties of the editorial board

The editor is responsible for validating submitted articles and making the final decision regarding their publication.
The editor is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and observes all legal norms regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
The editor evaluates the content of the manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the authors.
The Editor and any member of the Editorial Board must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors or reviewers.
Editors should decline to review manuscripts in which there is a conflict of interest as a result of competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or affiliations with any of the authors associated with the articles.
Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and post corrections if competing interests are disclosed after publication.
The editor takes appropriate action when ethical complaints are raised about a submitted manuscript or published paper. Such measures include contacting the author of the manuscript and duly considering the relevant complaint or allegations made. If the complaint is confirmed, it requires the publication of a correction or withdrawal of the published material.

Duties of reviewers

Reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the material submitted for publication.
All manuscripts received for review will be treated as confidential documents and will not be released to third parties without authorization from the editor.
Reviews must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate. Referees clearly express their views with supporting arguments.
The reviewer should bring to the editor's attention any significant similarity or overlap between the manuscript under review and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest as a result of competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or affiliations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the reports.

Duties of authors

Materials submitted for publication should present an accurate account of the research conducted, as well as an objective analysis of its significance.
Basic data should be presented accurately in the article.
The document should contain sufficient detail and references to allow reproduction of the development.
Deceptive or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work of other authors, this must be cited appropriately.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. If any article submitted to the journal is plagiarized, the editors reserve the right to reject that article and any others submitted by the same authors.
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Publication of certain types of articles in more than one journal is sometimes justified, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the respective journals must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary paper. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been previously published, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication has been approved by all authors and tacitly or expressly by the responsible authorities where the work was done, and that, if is accepted, it will not be published elsewhere.
Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the work reported.
Authorship should be limited to those who contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other material conflict of interest that could be interpreted as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her own published work, it is the author's responsibility to immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal and to cooperate with the editor in retracting or correcting the article. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that the published work contains a material error, it is the author's duty to immediately retract or correct the article or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original article.

Peer Review Policy

The journal maintains the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good scientific output is published. This is an objective process at the heart of good scientific publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Review process:

Submission of the article
The corresponding or submitting author sends the article by email.

Editorial evaluation
Editorial experts check the composition and arrangement of the article against the journal's requirements to ensure that it includes the necessary sections and stylizations. At this stage, the originality of the article is checked using several anti-plagiarism tools and services. The English language is also checked by a language expert.

Evaluation by the editor-in-chief
The editor-in-chief checks whether the article is suitable for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. Otherwise, the article may be rejected without further review. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are usually forwarded to at least two experts for review.

Invitation to reviewers
The journal uses double-blind peer review, where the referee and the author remain anonymous throughout the process. All articles are reviewed by external reviewers. Referees are associated with a given article according to their expertise.

The editor's decision is final
The referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Members of the international editorial boards provide advice and guidance to the editors-in-chief in general and assist in making decisions on specific materials.

Final decision
The final decision to accept or reject the article will be sent to the author together with the recommendations made by the reviewers.